Q14872 / key B
Rule 403: Fit Before Drama
selected 32020302 / source 32020302
Open case study ->Relevant evidence can still lose when unfair prejudice or waste substantially outweighs value.
Case studies
5
Reusable keys
15
Trap keys
4
LeadMe steps
40
Drill seeds
15
Q14872 / key B
selected 32020302 / source 32020302
Open case study ->Q14875 / key C
selected 32020302 / source 32020302
Open case study ->Q14899 / key C
selected 32020302 / source 32020302
Open case study ->Q17130 / key C
selected 32020302 / source 32020302
Open case study ->Q18503 / key B
selected 32020302 / source 32020302
Open case study ->Gold Key / Q14872
Graphic or unpleasant photos can be admitted when they help an expert explain a disputed consequential fact; Rule 403 excludes only when unfair prejudice or confusion substantially outweighs probative value.
Gold Key / Q14872
A test or demonstration is weak when the conditions that matter are not sufficiently similar to the litigated event.
Silver Key / Q14872
For an admissibility question, read the offered purpose before reacting to the evidence's emotional force.
Gold Key / Q14875
Rule 403 weighs probative value against unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, misleading the jury, undue delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
Proof drill / Q14872
A civil defendant offers old driving citations to prove a party drove fast during the accident. What is the first Evidence cut?
Cut it as propensity evidence.
Proof drill / Q14875
Name three Rule 403 dangers besides unfair prejudice.
Confusing the issues, misleading the jury, undue delay, wasting time, or needless cumulative evidence.
01 Relevance
02 Exclusion of Relevant Evidence
03 Discretionary exclusion
Making 403 a simple relevance test instead of a weighted exclusion rule.
source_outline_code
recommended_outline_code
recode_status
recode_reason
red_axis
purple_array_profile
blue_by_choice
leadme_next_step