Revised stem
A mission kitchen sued the manufacturer of an industrial warming oven after volunteers were burned while heating food in sealed containers. The kitchen offered three letters that the manufacturer received before shipping this oven. In the letters, other customers reported similar burn incidents. The manufacturer objects that the letters are hearsay and, in the alternative, asks the court to instruct the jury that the letters may be considered only on notice, not for the truth of the earlier incidents. How should the court rule?
Answer flow
01 Identify the out-of-court statements: customer letters sent before this shipment.
02 Ask why the letters are offered: to show the manufacturer had notice of similar incidents.
03 Classify the use as non-hearsay because notice is different from proving the complaints were true.
04 Overrule the hearsay objection for the limited notice purpose.
05 Apply FRE 105 because the manufacturer made a timely limiting-instruction request.
06 Cut A because it misses the non-hearsay notice purpose.
07 Cut B because it omits the required limiting instruction.
08 Cut D because the exhibit-reading limit is not the governing rule.
09 Choose C.