Abandonment
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Contracts1
Example wrong choices
14455_tutor-piano · CONTRACTS · Choice AOnly the student is in breach and liable for the teacher's damages, if any.
Why it's attractive
The student's payment duty was not yet due; refusing to pay early is not a breach
Why it's wrong
The student's payment duty was not yet due; refusing to pay early is not a breach
14455_tutor-piano · CONTRACTS · Choice BBoth parties took reasonable positions, and neither is in breach.
Why it's attractive
The teacher quit without contractual justification; 'both reasonable' is not a legal category when one party clearly repudiated
Why it's wrong
The teacher quit without contractual justification; 'both reasonable' is not a legal category when one party clearly repudiated
14455_tutor-piano · CONTRACTS · Choice DBoth parties are in breach, and each is entitled to damages, if any, from the other.
Why it's attractive
The teacher did breach, but the student's refusal to pay something not yet due is not a breach
Why it's wrong
The teacher did breach, but the student's refusal to pay something not yet due is not a breach
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →