MisconceptionObserved in bank
Ability To Pay Is Relevant
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Evidence1
Example wrong choices
22156_book_fair_van_insurance · EVIDENCE · Choice ANo, because policy prohibits the introduction of evidence that a party did or did not have liability insurance on the day of an accident.
Why it's attractive
It states the policy rule as an absolute ban.
Why it's wrong
It states the policy rule as an absolute ban.
22156_book_fair_van_insurance · EVIDENCE · Choice CNo, because it has no probative value relative to the issues in the case.
Why it's attractive
It ignores that ownership is disputed.
Why it's wrong
It ignores that ownership is disputed.
22156_book_fair_van_insurance · EVIDENCE · Choice DYes, because it is relevant to Daniel's ability to pay a judgment rendered against him.
Why it's attractive
It gives the right admissibility outcome but the wrong fact of consequence.
Why it's wrong
It gives the right admissibility outcome but the wrong fact of consequence.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →