Absolute Privilege Myth
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Constitutional Law1
Example wrong choices
14286_human-cannonball-barnabas · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice Ahold against the performer, because its action deprives the performer of his property without due process.
Why it's attractive
Due Process restricts government action, not private parties. The station is not the government.
Why it's wrong
Due Process restricts government action, not private parties. The station is not the government.
14286_human-cannonball-barnabas · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice Bhold against the performer, because the First and Fourteenth Amendments authorize press coverage of newsworthy entertainment events.
Why it's attractive
The First Amendment authorizes press coverage of newsworthy events, but that right is not immunity from tort liability. The key distinction: covering news ≠ appropriating the entire commercial value of a performance.
Why it's wrong
The First Amendment authorizes press coverage of newsworthy events, but that right is not immunity from tort liability. The key distinction: covering news ≠ appropriating the entire commercial value of a performance.
14286_human-cannonball-barnabas · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice Dhold against the performer, because under the First and Fourteenth Amendments news broadcasts are absolutely privileged.
Why it's attractive
Constitutional privileges for the press are never absolute. 'Always/never/only' formulations are structural red flags.
Why it's wrong
Constitutional privileges for the press are never absolute. 'Always/never/only' formulations are structural red flags.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →