ArchitectureObserved in bank
Absolute Sales Effect Language
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Torts1
Example wrong choices
21210_psalm_sticker_printer · TORTS · Choice AYes, because trade libel does not require proof of any lost sale or other pecuniary loss.
Why it's attractive
It says proof of lost sale or pecuniary loss is not required.
Why it's wrong
It says proof of lost sale or pecuniary loss is not required.
21210_psalm_sticker_printer · TORTS · Choice BNo, because trade libel can be committed only by a business competitor.
Why it's attractive
It makes competitor status the rule.
Why it's wrong
It makes competitor status the rule.
21210_psalm_sticker_printer · TORTS · Choice CYes, because sharp product criticism is trade libel whenever future buyers might be discouraged.
Why it's attractive
The word whenever makes possible buyer reaction enough.
Why it's wrong
The word whenever makes possible buyer reaction enough.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →