ArchitectureObserved in bank
Absolute Zero Recovery
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Contracts1
Example wrong choices
14516_lydia_nativity_sets · CONTRACTS · Choice ANothing, because the lender never tacitly agreed that Lydia could recover damages if it breached the loan promise.
Why it's attractive
The answer demands a tacit-agreement requirement the stem never gives.
Why it's wrong
The answer demands a tacit-agreement requirement the stem never gives.
14516_lydia_nativity_sets · CONTRACTS · Choice C$8,400, Lydia's foreseeable lost profit from the nativity-set purchase.
Why it's attractive
The stem gives the missing fact: Lydia said nothing about the resale plan.
Why it's wrong
The stem gives the missing fact: Lydia said nothing about the resale plan.
14516_lydia_nativity_sets · CONTRACTS · Choice DNothing, because damages for a lost business opportunity are never recoverable.
Why it's attractive
The word 'never' is too broad.
Why it's wrong
The word 'never' is too broad.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →