Acceptance Needed To Block Revocation
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Contracts1
Example wrong choices
22425_firm-offer-hymnals · CONTRACTS · Choice AYes, because Timothy had not communicated any acceptance to Daniel.
Why it's attractive
Acceptance is irrelevant — the question is whether the revocation was effective, not whether a contract was formed
Why it's wrong
Acceptance is irrelevant — the question is whether the revocation was effective, not whether a contract was formed
22425_firm-offer-hymnals · CONTRACTS · Choice BYes, because there was no consideration to support keeping the offer open.
Why it's attractive
The choice invents a requirement (consideration) that the firm offer rule specifically eliminates
Why it's wrong
The choice invents a requirement (consideration) that the firm offer rule specifically eliminates
22425_firm-offer-hymnals · CONTRACTS · Choice DNo, because Daniel did not communicate his revocation in writing.
Why it's attractive
The writing requirement applies to the offer, not the revocation — even an oral revocation would be ineffective under § 2-205
Why it's wrong
The writing requirement applies to the offer, not the revocation — even an oral revocation would be ineffective under § 2-205
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →