Acquittal Always Bars Later Case
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- CRIMINAL1
Example wrong choices
18420_national-park-ranger · CRIMINAL · Choice AYes, because the state acquittal has preclusive effect in the later federal prosecution under collateral-estoppel principles
Why it's attractive
The answer uses a preclusion label without solving the separate-sovereign problem.
Why it's wrong
The answer uses a preclusion label without solving the separate-sovereign problem.
18420_national-park-ranger · CRIMINAL · Choice CNo, because assaulting a federal officer requires an element not present in the state assault charge, satisfying the Blockburger test
Why it's attractive
The answer jumps to element comparison instead of the sovereign split.
Why it's wrong
The answer jumps to element comparison instead of the sovereign split.
18420_national-park-ranger · CRIMINAL · Choice DYes, because a jury acquittal on charges arising from the same conduct absolutely bars any later prosecution for that conduct
Why it's attractive
The answer says same conduct absolutely bars any later prosecution.
Why it's wrong
The answer says same conduct absolutely bars any later prosecution.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →