Admission Of Liability Required
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Evidence1
Example wrong choices
19745_bible_study_soup_warmer · EVIDENCE · Choice AAdmit the evidence because Rule 407 bars negligence proof, not products-liability proof.
Why it's attractive
The answer narrows Rule 407 to negligence even though the offered purpose is product defect and warning need.
Why it's wrong
The answer narrows Rule 407 to negligence even though the offered purpose is product defect and warning need.
19745_bible_study_soup_warmer · EVIDENCE · Choice BExclude the evidence only if the manufacturer admits responsibility for Ruth's injury.
Why it's attractive
The answer adds a liability-admission condition that the stem and taught rule do not contain.
Why it's wrong
The answer adds a liability-admission condition that the stem and taught rule do not contain.
19745_bible_study_soup_warmer · EVIDENCE · Choice DAdmit the evidence because later safety upgrades always show that the earlier product was defective.
Why it's attractive
The word always is too broad, and the answer ignores the offered-purpose limit.
Why it's wrong
The word always is too broad, and the answer ignores the offered-purpose limit.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →