All Jurisdiction Is Non Waivable
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Civil Procedure1
Example wrong choices
18060_tutor_barnabas · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice AHear it, because personal jurisdiction is not waivable and may be raised at any time.
Why it's attractive
The choice says personal jurisdiction is not waivable. That overstates — only subject matter jurisdiction is non-waivable. The word 'not waivable' is an overclaim detectable from the answer text itself.
Why it's wrong
The choice says personal jurisdiction is not waivable. That overstates — only subject matter jurisdiction is non-waivable. The word 'not waivable' is an overclaim detectable from the answer text itself.
18060_tutor_barnabas · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice DDeny it only if the plaintiff establishes minimum contacts between the defendant and the forum.
Why it's attractive
The choice frames the issue around minimum contacts. But the call asks how the court should rule on the defense — a procedural question. Minimum contacts is the merits analysis that comes only if the defense is preserved.
Why it's wrong
The choice frames the issue around minimum contacts. But the call asks how the court should rule on the defense — a procedural question. Minimum contacts is the merits analysis that comes only if the defense is preserved.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →