All Nonresident Discrimination Is Invalid
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Constitutional Law1
Example wrong choices
22719_pauls_tidepool_permit · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice BYes, because charging nonresident children more for the permit violates the Privileges and Immunities Clause.
Why it's attractive
It sees nonresident discrimination but skips the activity-type limit.
Why it's wrong
It sees nonresident discrimination but skips the activity-type limit.
22719_pauls_tidepool_permit · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice CNo, because improving children's health is a compelling state interest.
Why it's attractive
It uses strict-scrutiny language when the item is in rational-basis territory.
Why it's wrong
It uses strict-scrutiny language when the item is in rational-basis territory.
22719_pauls_tidepool_permit · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice DYes, because the law denies equal protection by treating nonresident children differently from resident children.
Why it's attractive
It stops after noticing different treatment and never asks the level of review.
Why it's wrong
It stops after noticing different treatment and never asks the level of review.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →