All Prior Inconsistent Statements Prove Truth
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Evidence1
Example wrong choices
14812_cracked_harp_recording · EVIDENCE · Choice Ainadmissible, because it is hearsay not within any exception.
Why it's attractive
The call asks what the recording is, and impeachment is a nontruth use.
Why it's wrong
The call asks what the recording is, and impeachment is a nontruth use.
14812_cracked_harp_recording · EVIDENCE · Choice Binadmissible, because secretly recording John invaded John's right of privacy under the U.S. Constitution.
Why it's attractive
The facts give a private recording and no state actor or privilege.
Why it's wrong
The facts give a private recording and no state actor or privilege.
14812_cracked_harp_recording · EVIDENCE · Choice Dadmissible as evidence that Lydia knew about the hidden crack before the sale and to impeach John's testimony.
Why it's attractive
The word 'and' crosses from credibility to truth.
Why it's wrong
The word 'and' crosses from credibility to truth.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →