All Statutory Violations Void Contracts
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Contracts1
Example wrong choices
14396_easter_handbell_plan · CONTRACTS · Choice AYes, because the written protection agreement will be strictly construed against Barnabas as the drafter.
Why it's attractive
The answer talks about construing drafted language, but the call asks enforceability after statutory violation.
Why it's wrong
The answer talks about construing drafted language, but the call asks enforceability after statutory violation.
14396_easter_handbell_plan · CONTRACTS · Choice CNo, because the protection agreement is not a divisible contract.
Why it's attractive
Divisibility has no matching fact in the stem.
Why it's wrong
Divisibility has no matching fact in the stem.
14396_easter_handbell_plan · CONTRACTS · Choice DNo, because the protection agreement violated the statute.
Why it's attractive
The statutory violation is real, but the answer omits the protected-class exception.
Why it's wrong
The statutory violation is real, but the answer omits the protected-class exception.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →