MisconceptionObserved in bank
Anonymous Informant Auto Invalid
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- CRIMINAL1
Example wrong choices
16000_scribes_loft_warrant · CRIMINAL · Choice Bthe affidavit submitted in support of the warrant was based entirely on hearsay.
Why it's attractive
It attacks source, not place.
Why it's wrong
It attacks source, not place.
16000_scribes_loft_warrant · CRIMINAL · Choice Cthe information contained in the affidavit submitted in support of the warrant was not corroborated by any independent police observation.
Why it's attractive
It fights the same probable-cause lane.
Why it's wrong
It fights the same probable-cause lane.
16000_scribes_loft_warrant · CRIMINAL · Choice Dthe affidavit submitted in support of the warrant did not disclose the informant's name.
Why it's attractive
It focuses on the missing name, not the place mismatch.
Why it's wrong
It focuses on the missing name, not the place mismatch.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →