← All traps
ArchitectureObserved in bank

Answer Array Split

This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”

Subject distribution

  • Evidence1

Example wrong choices

  • 22223_relief-kickback-cross · EVIDENCE · Choice AYes, but the answer is admissible only as substantive evidence against Timothy.

    Why it's attractive

    It keeps the oath-proceeding upgrade but drops ordinary impeachment.

    Why it's wrong

    It keeps the oath-proceeding upgrade but drops ordinary impeachment.

  • 22223_relief-kickback-cross · EVIDENCE · Choice CNo.

    Why it's attractive

    It treats the old immunity grant as a total bar even after Daniel testified on the same subject.

    Why it's wrong

    It treats the old immunity grant as a total bar even after Daniel testified on the same subject.

  • 22223_relief-kickback-cross · EVIDENCE · Choice DYes, but the answer is admissible only to impeach Daniel's credibility.

    Why it's attractive

    It keeps the usual prior-inconsistent-statement use but drops the sworn-proceeding upgrade.

    Why it's wrong

    It keeps the usual prior-inconsistent-statement use but drops the sworn-proceeding upgrade.

Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.

Practice questions using this trap →
Answer Array Split — Trap Taxonomy | BarMatrix