Any Defendant Testimony Satisfies Confrontation
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- CRIMINAL1
Example wrong choices
14582_road_to_emmaus_confession · CRIMINAL · Choice ACorrect, whether or not Barnabas took the stand at trial.
Why it's attractive
The words 'whether or not' erase the fact the correct reason uses: whether Barnabas testified.
Why it's wrong
The words 'whether or not' erase the fact the correct reason uses: whether Barnabas testified.
14582_road_to_emmaus_confession · CRIMINAL · Choice BIncorrect, because Lydia's own confession was properly admitted into evidence.
Why it's attractive
The call challenges Barnabas's confession; this answer talks about Lydia's confession.
Why it's wrong
The call challenges Barnabas's confession; this answer talks about Lydia's confession.
14582_road_to_emmaus_confession · CRIMINAL · Choice DIncorrect, because Lydia testified in her own defense.
Why it's attractive
The call needs Barnabas crossable; Lydia's own testimony is not the same thing.
Why it's wrong
The call needs Barnabas crossable; Lydia's own testimony is not the same thing.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →