Any On Land Injury Triggers The Highest Duty
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Torts1
Example wrong choices
17264_prayer_parcel_trip · TORTS · Choice BThe full invitee inspection duty for all hazards on the land.
Why it's attractive
The invitee inspection duty runs only to invitees; no-entry signs are affirmative evidence the owner did not invite the public.
Why it's wrong
The invitee inspection duty runs only to invitees; no-entry signs are affirmative evidence the owner did not invite the public.
17264_prayer_parcel_trip · TORTS · Choice CA duty to warn of every natural condition on remote land.
Why it's attractive
The traditional duty to unknown trespassers is narrow; it does not include a duty to warn of every natural condition on remote land.
Why it's wrong
The traditional duty to unknown trespassers is narrow; it does not include a duty to warn of every natural condition on remote land.
17264_prayer_parcel_trip · TORTS · Choice DStrict liability because no-entry signs prove the owner expected injury.
Why it's attractive
Premises liability to trespassers is fault-based, not strict; warning signs are evidence of reasonable care.
Why it's wrong
Premises liability to trespassers is fault-based, not strict; warning signs are evidence of reasonable care.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →