Any Quantity Term Is Requirements Contract
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Contracts1
Example wrong choices
21519_goats · CONTRACTS · Choice AIn favor of Peter, because this is a valid requirements contract.
Why it's attractive
The word 'decides' gives Peter total discretion — no commitment = no requirements contract
Why it's wrong
The word 'decides' gives Peter total discretion — no commitment = no requirements contract
21519_goats · CONTRACTS · Choice BIn favor of Peter, because of his detrimental reliance.
Why it's attractive
Advertising a dinner you already planned is not changing position because of the contract
Why it's wrong
Advertising a dinner you already planned is not changing position because of the contract
21519_goats · CONTRACTS · Choice DIn favor of Daniel, under the doctrine of impossibility.
Why it's attractive
Daniel can still supply goats — it just costs more. Expensive ≠ impossible.
Why it's wrong
Daniel can still supply goats — it just costs more. Expensive ≠ impossible.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →