Any Taking Myth
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- CRIMINAL1
Example wrong choices
19261_christian-camp-treasurer · CRIMINAL · Choice ANo theft offense, because Lydia was authorized to sign checks on the camp's account.
Why it's attractive
Overclaims scope of authorization as if blanket permission; ignores purpose-limitation of the fiduciary role
Why it's wrong
Overclaims scope of authorization as if blanket permission; ignores purpose-limitation of the fiduciary role
19261_christian-camp-treasurer · CRIMINAL · Choice CFalse pretenses, because the family was deceived about how their payment would be used.
Why it's attractive
Points to the family-payment transaction rather than Lydia's conversion act; wrong doctrine entirely (no false statement before the transfer)
Why it's wrong
Points to the family-payment transaction rather than Lydia's conversion act; wrong doctrine entirely (no false statement before the transfer)
19261_christian-camp-treasurer · CRIMINAL · Choice DLarceny, because any taking of another's money constitutes larceny.
Why it's attractive
Absolute claim ('any taking is larceny') is false on its face; larceny requires a trespassory taking without lawful initial possession
Why it's wrong
Absolute claim ('any taking is larceny') is false on its face; larceny requires a trespassory taking without lawful initial possession
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →