Any True Warranty Statement Must Win
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Real Property1
Example wrong choices
19498_bell-meadow-retreat · REAL_PROPERTY · Choice AStephen has an effective claim against Mary for breach of Mary's covenants of title.
Why it's attractive
The choice talks about Stephen's claim against Mary, while the call asks for Hannah's title against Stephen.
Why it's wrong
The choice talks about Stephen's claim against Mary, while the call asks for Hannah's title against Stephen.
19498_bell-meadow-retreat · REAL_PROPERTY · Choice CPaul's conveyance of Bell Meadow to Stephen resulted from Mary's effort to make good on Mary's covenants in her deed to Stephen.
Why it's attractive
The choice explains why Stephen received title, but not why Hannah owns it.
Why it's wrong
The choice explains why Stephen received title, but not why Hannah owns it.
19498_bell-meadow-retreat · REAL_PROPERTY · Choice DStephen intended to convey Bell Meadow to Hannah when he signed the deed to Hannah.
Why it's attractive
Intent to include a parcel is not the same as having a title rule that transfers it later.
Why it's wrong
Intent to include a parcel is not the same as having a title rule that transfers it later.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →