← All traps
MisconceptionObserved in bank

Availability Always Required

This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”

Subject distribution

  • Evidence1

Example wrong choices

  • 22214_barnabas-hearsay · EVIDENCE · Choice ANo, because the statement does not meet the applicable hearsay exception.

    Why it's attractive

    Before asking whether a hearsay exception applies, ask: is this hearsay? The statement is offered for effect on listener, not truth.

    Why it's wrong

    Before asking whether a hearsay exception applies, ask: is this hearsay? The statement is offered for effect on listener, not truth.

  • 22214_barnabas-hearsay · EVIDENCE · Choice BNo, because there is no indication that the customer is unavailable to testify.

    Why it's attractive

    Availability matters only for hearsay exceptions that require unavailability. If the statement isn't hearsay, availability is irrelevant.

    Why it's wrong

    Availability matters only for hearsay exceptions that require unavailability. If the statement isn't hearsay, availability is irrelevant.

  • 22214_barnabas-hearsay · EVIDENCE · Choice DYes, because Barnabas is defending himself against a criminal charge.

    Why it's attractive

    The criminal-defense posture doesn't change hearsay analysis. The statement is admissible because of its non-hearsay purpose, not because the case is criminal.

    Why it's wrong

    The criminal-defense posture doesn't change hearsay analysis. The statement is admissible because of its non-hearsay purpose, not because the case is criminal.

Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.

Practice questions using this trap →
Availability Always Required — Trap Taxonomy | BarMatrix