← All traps
ArchitectureObserved in bank

Backwards Rule

This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 2 active questions. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”

Subject distribution

  • Contracts1
  • Real Property1

Example wrong choices

  • 17113_pottery-studio · CONTRACTS · Choice AYes, because the agreement between Hannah and Paul prohibited assignment.

    Why it's attractive

    The choice identifies a real breach but answers a different remedial question than the one asked

    Why it's wrong

    The choice identifies a real breach but answers a different remedial question than the one asked

  • 17113_pottery-studio · CONTRACTS · Choice BYes, because the design work that remained to be completed at the time of Paul's assignment involved personal services.

    Why it's attractive

    Correctly spots the personal-services fact but reverses its legal consequence

    Why it's wrong

    Correctly spots the personal-services fact but reverses its legal consequence

  • 17113_pottery-studio · CONTRACTS · Choice DNo, because an agreement not to assign destroys the power but not the right to make a valid assignment.

    Why it's attractive

    The choice states the anti-assignment rule backwards — it destroys the right, not the power

    Why it's wrong

    The choice states the anti-assignment rule backwards — it destroys the right, not the power

  • 22019_cedar_ridge_heat_covenant · REAL_PROPERTY · Choice ANo, because the agreement to purchase heat did not touch and concern Naomi's land.

    Why it's attractive

    Touch and concern decides successor liability, not the promisor's own contract.

    Why it's wrong

    Touch and concern decides successor liability, not the promisor's own contract.

  • 22019_cedar_ridge_heat_covenant · REAL_PROPERTY · Choice BNo, because Paul did not sign the deed.

    Why it's attractive

    Paul signed the written contract; a grantee is bound by accepting the deed without signing.

    Why it's wrong

    Paul signed the written contract; a grantee is bound by accepting the deed without signing.

  • 22019_cedar_ridge_heat_covenant · REAL_PROPERTY · Choice DYes, because a discrepancy between a contract for the sale of realty and a conveyance is resolved by looking to the contract.

    Why it's attractive

    There is no contract/deed discrepancy here, and the deed controls if there were.

    Why it's wrong

    There is no contract/deed discrepancy here, and the deed controls if there were.

Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.

Practice questions using this trap →
Backwards Rule — Trap Taxonomy | BarMatrix