Buyer Must Tender Despite Effective Repudiation
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Contracts1
Example wrong choices
14508_riverside_retreat_parcel · CONTRACTS · Choice ANo, because Stephen's tender of the purchase price on April 18 was a constructive condition to Lydia's duty to deliver the deed.
Why it's attractive
The answer ignores that the seller's repudiation came first and was not effectively retracted.
Why it's wrong
The answer ignores that the seller's repudiation came first and was not effectively retracted.
14508_riverside_retreat_parcel · CONTRACTS · Choice CNo, because Lydia retracted the repudiation before the agreed time for performance.
Why it's attractive
The answer watches the closing date but skips the substitute-purchase date.
Why it's wrong
The answer watches the closing date but skips the substitute-purchase date.
14508_riverside_retreat_parcel · CONTRACTS · Choice DYes, because Lydia's repudiation could not be retracted after Stephen received it.
Why it's attractive
The answer says 'could not be retracted after received,' which is broader than the taught rule.
Why it's wrong
The answer says 'could not be retracted after received,' which is broader than the taught rule.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →