Bystander No Special Relationship
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- CRIMINAL1
Example wrong choices
14660_tent-revival-kerosene · CRIMINAL · Choice AMurder in the second degree.
Why it's attractive
Common law murder (depraved heart / malice aforethought) requires a predicate unlawful act or omission under a legal duty. Hannah committed no act and had no legal duty. The 'murder at common law' label cannot attach to an omission without a prior legal duty.
Why it's wrong
Common law murder (depraved heart / malice aforethought) requires a predicate unlawful act or omission under a legal duty. Hannah committed no act and had no legal duty. The 'murder at common law' label cannot attach to an omission without a prior legal duty.
14660_tent-revival-kerosene · CRIMINAL · Choice CManslaughter.
Why it's attractive
The jurisdictional definition of manslaughter includes 'gross negligence or reckless indifference to consequence.' Hannah's conduct looks reckless. But the gross-negligence prong applies to unlawful conduct — and conduct by omission is only unlawful when there is a prior legal duty. The threshold duty element is the missing piece. half_truth: the manslaughter standard is real, but the legal-duty element is absent.
Why it's wrong
The jurisdictional definition of manslaughter includes 'gross negligence or reckless indifference to consequence.' Hannah's conduct looks reckless. But the gross-negligence prong applies to unlawful conduct — and conduct by omission is only unlawful when there is a prior legal duty. The threshold duty element is the missing piece. half_truth: the manslaughter standard is real, but the legal-duty element is absent.
14660_tent-revival-kerosene · CRIMINAL · Choice DMurder in the first degree.
Why it's attractive
First-degree murder requires intentional homicide with premeditation and deliberation — the most demanding mental-state requirement in the crime hierarchy. Hannah formed no intent to kill anyone; she intended only to leave. The given statutory definition makes this clear. Additionally, the threshold duty problem defeats any omission-based murder theory.
Why it's wrong
First-degree murder requires intentional homicide with premeditation and deliberation — the most demanding mental-state requirement in the crime hierarchy. Hannah formed no intent to kill anyone; she intended only to leave. The given statutory definition makes this clear. Additionally, the threshold duty problem defeats any omission-based murder theory.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →