← All traps
ArchitectureObserved in bank

Causation Gap

This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 2 active questions. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”

Subject distribution

  • CRIMINAL2

Example wrong choices

  • 16150_lake_retreat_certificate · CRIMINAL · Choice Aguilty because the certificate requirement is designed to protect swimmers, and ignoring it is negligence.

    Why it's attractive

    The choice talks about why the rule exists, not whether the missing certificate caused the death.

    Why it's wrong

    The choice talks about why the rule exists, not whether the missing certificate caused the death.

  • 16150_lake_retreat_certificate · CRIMINAL · Choice Cnot guilty because manslaughter always requires an intent to kill.

    Why it's attractive

    The word always overclaims manslaughter's mental-state requirement.

    Why it's wrong

    The word always overclaims manslaughter's mental-state requirement.

  • 16150_lake_retreat_certificate · CRIMINAL · Choice Dguilty under the misdemeanor-manslaughter rule.

    Why it's attractive

    This choice stops at the misdemeanor label and never connects it to the death.

    Why it's wrong

    This choice stops at the misdemeanor label and never connects it to the death.

  • 21678_retreat_center_interview_crash · CRIMINAL · Choice AGuilty, because Peter was negligent under the totality of the circumstances.

    Why it's attractive

    The answer talks about negligence but skips the crash cause.

    Why it's wrong

    The answer talks about negligence but skips the crash cause.

  • 21678_retreat_center_interview_crash · CRIMINAL · Choice CGuilty, because driving while intoxicated is malum in se.

    Why it's attractive

    A label cannot replace the missing causal bridge.

    Why it's wrong

    A label cannot replace the missing causal bridge.

  • 21678_retreat_center_interview_crash · CRIMINAL · Choice DGuilty, because Peter was grossly negligent in taking three times his prescribed medicine and drinking beer before driving.

    Why it's attractive

    This proves bad conduct, not that the bad conduct caused Daniel's death.

    Why it's wrong

    This proves bad conduct, not that the bad conduct caused Daniel's death.

Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.

Practice questions using this trap →
Causation Gap — Trap Taxonomy | BarMatrix