Commerce Clause Whenever Cross Border Actor Appears
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Constitutional Law1
Example wrong choices
19722_psalmberry_park_cut · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice AAs applied, the state statute unduly interferes with interstate commerce.
Why it's attractive
Out-of-state residence is bait; the stem gives a direct federal authorization conflict.
Why it's wrong
Out-of-state residence is bait; the stem gives a direct federal authorization conflict.
19722_psalmberry_park_cut · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice COnly the federal government can designate a plant as protected.
Why it's attractive
The word only overstates the reason the federal side wins.
Why it's wrong
The word only overstates the reason the federal side wins.
19722_psalmberry_park_cut · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice DAs applied, the state statute violates the Obligation of Contracts Clause of the United States Constitution.
Why it's attractive
The existence of a contract is a fact, but the defense comes from federal authorization.
Why it's wrong
The existence of a contract is a fact, but the defense comes from federal authorization.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →