Condition Failure Triggers Restitution
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Contracts1
Example wrong choices
19250_scripture_card_printer · CONTRACTS · Choice AStephen can recover only in restitution because the express condition failed.
Why it's attractive
It sounds precise because it gives Stephen a fallback remedy after a supposed failed condition. The breaker is that the performance metric was met under the commercial-utility Gold Key, so the condition did not fail.
Why it's wrong
The choice assumes the express condition failed; under the commercial-output standard, the output metric was met.
Spot it next time
Apply the Gold Key, then compare 3,200 required to 3,360 actual.
19250_scripture_card_printer · CONTRACTS · Choice CLydia may refuse rent because any satisfaction clause gives unlimited subjective discretion.
Why it's attractive
It sells the broad student myth that satisfaction words always make the buyer the judge. The breaker is the absolute any/unlimited language, which collapses a measured-performance clause into personal whim.
Why it's wrong
The words any and unlimited make the choice structurally overbroad.
Spot it next time
Mark any/unlimited as the tell.
19250_scripture_card_printer · CONTRACTS · Choice DLydia may refuse rent if she honestly dislikes any aspect of the printer.
Why it's attractive
It sells a familiar honesty idea: if Lydia truly dislikes the printer, satisfaction sounds absent. The breaker is the wrong frame; this clause asks about output, not personal taste.
Why it's wrong
The choice answers a personal-taste satisfaction question, not the measurable-output condition in the stem.
Spot it next time
Ask: satisfied about what?
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →