MisconceptionObserved in bank
Confusing Rationality Of Inference With Constitutionality Of Mandatory Instruction
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Evidence1
Example wrong choices
14842_vanished_bush_pilot · EVIDENCE · Choice AYes, because the defendant has a chance to rebut the presumption by offering evidence that Brother Paul is alive or has been heard from in the last seven years.
Why it's wrong
Choice A is not the credited answer for this item.
14842_vanished_bush_pilot · EVIDENCE · Choice BNo, because the fact that someone has not been heard from in seven years does not necessarily lead to a conclusion that the person is dead.
Why it's wrong
Choice B is not the credited answer for this item.
14842_vanished_bush_pilot · EVIDENCE · Choice DYes, because it expresses a rational conclusion that the jury should be required to accept.
Why it's wrong
Choice D is not the credited answer for this item.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →