Consideration Must Flow To Promisor
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Contracts1
Example wrong choices
14418_jericho_lamp_credit · CONTRACTS · Choice ABy providing the goods to Lydia on credit, Barnabas effectively accepted Paul's offer for a unilateral contract.
Why it's attractive
It proves a real formation point but does not supply the inaccurate statement.
Why it's wrong
It proves a real formation point but does not supply the inaccurate statement.
14418_jericho_lamp_credit · CONTRACTS · Choice CIt was important to the enforceability of Paul's promise to Barnabas that it be embodied in a signed writing.
Why it's attractive
It answers an affirmative enforceability issue, not the negative call.
Why it's wrong
It answers an affirmative enforceability issue, not the negative call.
14418_jericho_lamp_credit · CONTRACTS · Choice DAlthough Paul received no consideration from Lydia, Paul's promise is enforceable by Barnabas.
Why it's attractive
It resolves a no-consideration concern but not the inaccurate-statement target.
Why it's wrong
It resolves a no-consideration concern but not the inaccurate-statement target.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →