Current Route Overread
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Constitutional Law1
Example wrong choices
20358_retreat_receipts · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice AUnconstitutional, because Article III does not permit the United States Supreme Court to review lower state-court decisions directly.
Why it's attractive
This directly clashes with the Article III Gold Key: appellate jurisdiction exists in federal-law cases subject to congressional regulations.
Why it's wrong
This directly clashes with the Article III Gold Key: appellate jurisdiction exists in federal-law cases subject to congressional regulations.
20358_retreat_receipts · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice BUnconstitutional, because it invades the state's sovereign authority to decide whether its own lower-court rulings receive state appellate review.
Why it's attractive
The stem is about a federal statute. State control over ordinary state appeals does not cancel Supreme Court appellate review of federal-law issues.
Why it's wrong
The stem is about a federal statute. State control over ordinary state appeals does not cancel Supreme Court appellate review of federal-law issues.
20358_retreat_receipts · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice CConstitutional, because Congress may regulate interstate sales of the covered retreat equipment.
Why it's attractive
The call challenges the appeal provision, not the sales-disclosure provision.
Why it's wrong
The call challenges the appeal provision, not the sales-disclosure provision.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →