Declarant Witness Gate
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Evidence1
Example wrong choices
14804_nativity_badge_source · EVIDENCE · Choice Binadmissible, because Timothy was not confronted with the statement while on the stand.
Why it's attractive
It reaches inadmissibility but does not give the dispositive reason.
Why it's wrong
It reaches inadmissibility but does not give the dispositive reason.
14804_nativity_badge_source · EVIDENCE · Choice Cadmissible as a prior consistent statement by a witness.
Why it's attractive
The prior-consistent label is a real route, but the stem does not open it.
Why it's wrong
The prior-consistent label is a real route, but the stem does not open it.
14804_nativity_badge_source · EVIDENCE · Choice Dadmissible as an identification of Lydia by a witness after having perceived her.
Why it's attractive
The statement names Lydia, but the declarant-witness gate is missing.
Why it's wrong
The statement names Lydia, but the declarant-witness gate is missing.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →