Easement Absence
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Real Property1
Example wrong choices
15016_shadowed_scriptorium · REAL_PROPERTY · Choice AThe court should award permanent damages, instead of ordering Daniel to remove the building, equal to the present value of Ruth's lost rents over the reasonable life of her building.
Why it's attractive
The choice chooses a remedy after assuming Ruth has a protected light or view right.
Why it's wrong
The choice chooses a remedy after assuming Ruth has a protected light or view right.
15016_shadowed_scriptorium · REAL_PROPERTY · Choice CThe court should award Ruth damages for lost rent through trial and leave future losses for later actions.
Why it's attractive
The choice debates timing of damages, but the lawsuit fails before damages.
Why it's wrong
The choice debates timing of damages, but the lawsuit fails before damages.
15016_shadowed_scriptorium · REAL_PROPERTY · Choice DRuth is entitled to a mandatory injunction requiring Daniel to restore the prior sunlight conditions, insofar as the shadow is concerned.
Why it's attractive
The choice jumps to undoing the building instead of first asking whether Ruth owns the sunlight right.
Why it's wrong
The choice jumps to undoing the building instead of first asking whether Ruth owns the sunlight right.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →