Everything Answer Is Fairest
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Real Property1
Example wrong choices
22052_stephen_pottery · REAL_PROPERTY · Choice AStephen's brothers must pay a portion of the sums Stephen spent on principal, interest, and taxes, and any right that Stephen has against the brothers is subject to a setoff for the reasonable rental value of the premises.
Why it's attractive
Correctly awards carrying charges, then adds a rental-value setoff though there was no ouster and no partition accounting.
Why it's wrong
Correctly awards carrying charges, then adds a rental-value setoff though there was no ouster and no partition accounting.
22052_stephen_pottery · REAL_PROPERTY · Choice BStephen's brothers must pay a portion of the sums Stephen spent improving the property; they must pay a portion of the sums Stephen spent on principal, interest, and taxes; and any right that Stephen has against the brothers is subject to a setoff for the reasonable rental value of the premises.
Why it's attractive
Stretches the carrying-charge contribution rule to cover improvements and tacks on a rental setoff — two false add-ons on a true core.
Why it's wrong
Stretches the carrying-charge contribution rule to cover improvements and tacks on a rental setoff — two false add-ons on a true core.
22052_stephen_pottery · REAL_PROPERTY · Choice DStephen's brothers must pay a portion of the sum that Stephen spent on improving the property.
Why it's attractive
Awards contribution for the value-adding glazing room and omits the recoverable carrying charges — wrong on both ends.
Why it's wrong
Awards contribution for the value-adding glazing room and omits the recoverable carrying charges — wrong on both ends.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →