Exclusive Dealing Signal
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Contracts1
Example wrong choices
14458_verse_wristbands · CONTRACTS · Choice ADaniel wins, because the agreement was void for indefiniteness of quantity and total price for the year.
Why it's attractive
The answer attacks the missing annual quantity and total price; that is not enough once the output/exclusive-dealing anchor is supplied.
Why it's wrong
The answer attacks the missing annual quantity and total price; that is not enough once the output/exclusive-dealing anchor is supplied.
14458_verse_wristbands · CONTRACTS · Choice BLydia wins, because both parties to a sale-of-goods contract impliedly assume the risk of changes in price and customer demand.
Why it's attractive
It gives Lydia the win but answers through market-risk language, not the exclusivity fact.
Why it's wrong
It gives Lydia the win but answers through market-risk language, not the exclusivity fact.
14458_verse_wristbands · CONTRACTS · Choice CDaniel wins, because there was no mutuality of obligation since Daniel made no express promise to buy any of Lydia's Scripture-memory wristbands.
Why it's attractive
The answer demands magic words; the Gold Key supplies the missing obligation from exclusivity.
Why it's wrong
The answer demands magic words; the Gold Key supplies the missing obligation from exclusivity.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →