Express Prohibition Myth
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Constitutional Law1
Example wrong choices
19852_jubilee_leave_bank · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice AThe rule is valid because any program that might make workers healthier or calmer is part of job-site safety.
Why it's attractive
The choice treats any worker benefit as safety authority.
Why it's wrong
The choice treats any worker benefit as safety authority.
19852_jubilee_leave_bank · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice BThe rule is valid because private employers administer the leave bank, not the agency.
Why it's attractive
The answer talks about who administers the program, not who authorized the agency to impose it.
Why it's wrong
The answer talks about who administers the program, not who authorized the agency to impose it.
19852_jubilee_leave_bank · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice DThe rule is invalid only if Congress expressly barred the agency from requiring paid leave.
Why it's attractive
The choice invents an only-if threshold.
Why it's wrong
The choice invents an only-if threshold.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →