← All traps
MisconceptionArchitectureObserved in bank

Extreme Of Range

This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 91 active questions. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”

Subject distribution

  • CRIMINAL24
  • Real Property18
  • Contracts11
  • Torts11
  • Civil Procedure10
  • Evidence10
  • Criminal Law4
  • Constitutional Law3

Example wrong choices

first 20
  • 14068_retreat_canoe · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice BYes, Paul has a right to a jury trial as to every claim, regardless of whether they are equitable in nature.

    Why it's attractive

    Students see the legal damages claim and swing to a blanket yes.

    Why it's wrong

    CUT: the rule is not jury for every claim regardless of equitable nature.

  • 14205_fellowship_hall · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice AYes, because this is a proper final judgment, regardless of whether the case was tried at a bench or jury trial.

    Why it's wrong

    Choice A is not the credited answer for this item.

  • 14208_women_of_the_word · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice CNo, because Lydia did not have actual notice of the class action lawsuit.

    Why it's wrong

    Choice C is not the credited answer for this item.

  • 14248_lydia_clay_reclamation · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice CLydia's Workshop should prevail on both its claim for the equipment costs and its claim for expected profits.

    Why it's attractive

    It pays both categories even though the stem gives retained land value and retained equipment value.

    Why it's wrong

    It pays both categories even though the stem gives retained land value and retained equipment value.

  • 14365_imitation_honey · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice BThe enforcement powers of the Fourteenth Amendment.

    Why it's attractive

    Anchor: Fourteenth Amendment enforcement cannot reach purely private conduct.

    Why it's wrong

    Anchor: Fourteenth Amendment enforcement cannot reach purely private conduct.

  • 14409_sunken_ark_hall · CONTRACTS · Choice DBarnabas is excused under the modern doctrine of supervening impossibility, which includes severe impracticability.

    Why it's attractive

    The added cost is real, but the answer over-extends the excuse.

    Why it's wrong

    The added cost is real, but the answer over-extends the excuse.

  • 14437_lydias_verse_card_boxes · CONTRACTS · Choice AYes, because Barnabas’s letter created a one-year option contract.

    Why it's wrong

    Choice A is not the credited answer for this item.

  • 14441_naomi_scripture_workshop_commission · CONTRACTS · Choice C23%, because the parties' prior payment practice is given greater weight than trade usage.

    Why it's attractive

    C elevates one prior generous payment over the signed percentage.

    Why it's wrong

    C elevates one prior generous payment over the signed percentage.

  • 14467_psalm_tutor_installments · CONTRACTS · Choice A$1,200 plus the accrued interest, because Mary’s unexcused failure to pay three installments is a material breach.

    Why it's attractive

    The answer jumps from three missed installments to the whole balance.

    Why it's wrong

    The answer jumps from three missed installments to the whole balance.

  • 14492_psalm_lantern_kits · CONTRACTS · Choice DDaniel must accept the 19 kits but is entitled to cancel the rest of the contract.

    Why it's wrong

    Choice D is not the credited answer for this item.

  • 14532_scripture_audio_booth · CONTRACTS · Choice BNothing, because neither Martha nor Stephen took steps to avoid the consequences of Barnabas's breach.

    Why it's attractive

    The answer treats a missed mitigation step as destroying the whole claim.

    Why it's wrong

    The answer treats a missed mitigation step as destroying the whole claim.

  • 14560_death_qualified_choir · CRIMINAL · Choice BReverse both.

    Why it's attractive

    reverses more than the only argument can reach

    Why it's wrong

    reverses more than the only argument can reach

  • 14562_chapel_bank_stop · CRIMINAL · Choice DYes, because the confession was the fruit of both a Fourth Amendment violation and a Miranda violation.

    Why it's attractive

    fails both axes

    Why it's wrong

    fails both axes

  • 14570_manger_tote · CRIMINAL · Choice BDeny the motion, because Ruth was about to leave on the city shuttle and exigent circumstances existed.

    Why it's attractive

    The answer turns ordinary travel into an emergency label.

    Why it's wrong

    The answer turns ordinary travel into an emergency label.

  • 14574_jericho_wall_patrol_statement · CRIMINAL · Choice BGrant the motion on either ground stated.

    Why it's attractive

    It combines two failed grounds and treats the combination as stronger.

    Why it's wrong

    It combines two failed grounds and treats the combination as stronger.

  • 14599_bethany_stoneworks_inventory · CRIMINAL · Choice Adenied, because warrantless administrative inspections of commercial premises are valid without a warrant.

    Why it's attractive

    The answer says commercial premises generally, while the stem gives a special regulated industry.

    Why it's wrong

    The answer says commercial premises generally, while the stem gives a special regulated industry.

  • 14619_peters_two_burden_instruction · CRIMINAL_LAW · Choice AViolated by the instructions as to both issues.

    Why it's attractive

    Highest-pull trap: students see two defendant burdens and conclude both violate due process.

    Why it's wrong

    Over-applies the element-burden rule to both issues.

    Spot it next time

    Underline the statute and classify each issue separately.

  • 14633_galilee_cafe · CRIMINAL_LAW · Choice CYes, because he failed to retreat even though there was an opportunity available.

    Why it's attractive

    It uses the stem's retreat-jurisdiction fact and the near-door fact to make retreat feel dispositive.

    Why it's wrong

    Overextends retreat doctrine to nondeadly force.

    Spot it next time

    Apply Gold Key: nondeadly force does not require retreat.

  • 14654_fellowship_trail · CRIMINAL_LAW · Choice CIf the jurisdiction follows either the M'Naghten or the ALI Model Penal Code test for insanity.

    Why it's attractive

    It contains the correct ALI/MPC route and feels safer because it says either.

    Why it's wrong

    The answer expands the correct ALI/MPC route to include M'Naghten, but the M'Naghten half does not fit.

    Spot it next time

    For 'either' answers, require both named routes to fit the facts.

  • 14727_saddle_camp_report · CRIMINAL · Choice Ahis silence was not the proximate cause of Thomas's death.

    Why it's attractive

    The choice says causation is absent even though the stem leaves foreseeability pressure in place.

    Why it's wrong

    The choice says causation is absent even though the stem leaves foreseeability pressure in place.

Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.

Practice questions using this trap →
Extreme Of Range — Trap Taxonomy | BarMatrix