Extreme Risk
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- CRIMINAL1
Example wrong choices
21084_retreat-pavilion · CRIMINAL · Choice AInvoluntary manslaughter only, because Lydia did not intend to hit anyone
Why it's attractive
It treats lack of target intent as if it were the whole homicide analysis.
Why it's wrong
It treats lack of target intent as if it were the whole homicide analysis.
21084_retreat-pavilion · CRIMINAL · Choice BNo homicide liability, because the victim was not visible from outside
Why it's attractive
It invents a visibility requirement that the homicide law does not use.
Why it's wrong
It invents a visibility requirement that the homicide law does not use.
21084_retreat-pavilion · CRIMINAL · Choice DFirst-degree murder, because any gun death is automatically first degree
Why it's attractive
It turns a weapon fact into an automatic degree rule.
Why it's wrong
It turns a weapon fact into an automatic degree rule.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →