← All traps
ArchitectureObserved in bank

Fabricated Rule

This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 359 active questions. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”

Subject distribution

  • CRIMINAL94
  • Contracts59
  • Real Property57
  • Evidence54
  • Civil Procedure35
  • Constitutional Law29
  • Torts23
  • Criminal Law8

Example wrong choices

first 20
  • 14014_scripture_cart_jury_poll · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice DYes, because the judge was required to send the jurors back for further deliberations once the poll showed no unanimity.

    Why it's attractive

    The answer turns one available post-poll remedy into the only remedy.

    Why it's wrong

    The answer turns one available post-poll remedy into the only remedy.

  • 14071_threshing-sledge-patent · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice DThe judgment cannot stand because the two Brazilian jurors had an inadequate command of English.

    Why it's attractive

    Stem says English was adequate and no for-cause strike was sought; non-native English is not itself a reversal ground.

    Why it's wrong

    Stem says English was adequate and no for-cause strike was sought; non-native English is not itself a reversal ground.

  • 14090_federal_military_property_duty_defense · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice BYes, because Ruth's claim is automatically preempted by a federal defense.

    Why it's wrong

    Choice B is not the credited answer for this item.

  • 14108_ebike_delivery_sign · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice DYes, because Lydia waived the issue by not anticipating and rebutting the sign evidence in her case-in-chief.

    Why it's attractive

    It invents a duty to answer a defense before the defendant raises it.

    Why it's wrong

    It invents a duty to answer a defense before the defendant raises it.

  • 14132_lydia_vineyard_smj · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice DYes, because Lydia's lawyer may move for summary judgment now that Barnabas has contradicted the contract.

    Why it's attractive

    Choice uses a familiar case-stopping device, but the timing is wrong because trial is underway.

    Why it's wrong

    Choice uses a familiar case-stopping device, but the timing is wrong because trial is underway.

  • 14148_vineyard-sanctions · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice BYes, because Hannah's complaint did not make it apparent on its face that the legal theory was supported by existing law or a nonfrivolous argument for extending it.

    Why it's attractive

    Requires Gold Key: Rule 11 does not require complaint to affirmatively display legal basis on face; certification is implicit in signature

    Why it's wrong

    Requires Gold Key: Rule 11 does not require complaint to affirmatively display legal basis on face; certification is implicit in signature

  • 14216_retreat_shuttle · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice DYes. Barnabas will be precluded from relitigating whether he negligently backed into the tent.

    Why it's attractive

    It treats party status alone as enough for issue preclusion.

    Why it's wrong

    It treats party status alone as enough for issue preclusion.

  • 14222_piano_tutor_counterclaim_default · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice AYes, because Peter's failure to answer the counterclaim alone authorizes the clerk to enter a default judgment.

    Why it's attractive

    The stem separates entry of default from the later request for default judgment.

    Why it's wrong

    The stem separates entry of default from the later request for default judgment.

  • 14233_galilee_nets_fieldhouse · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice BThe intense public preoccupation with professional e-sports teams, coupled with the fact that live gaming finals have become a favorite modern pastime, is sufficient to justify application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the activities of professional e-sports teams.

    Why it's attractive

    The choice turns public interest and cultural status into state power.

    Why it's wrong

    The choice turns public interest and cultural status into state power.

  • 14234_barnabas-house · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice ABecause the commission's action effectively discriminates against a quasi-suspect class in relation to a basic subsistence need, the commission must prove that the denial is substantially related to an important governmental interest.

    Why it's attractive

    Choice creates quasi-suspect/basic-subsistence trigger not supplied by the taught anchor.

    Why it's wrong

    Choice creates quasi-suspect/basic-subsistence trigger not supplied by the taught anchor.

  • 14237_harvest_table_radio_segment · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice BNo, because the U.S. Constitution provides a cause of action against any state-accredited school that restricts freedom of speech as a condition of employment.

    Why it's attractive

    The word any creates an overbroad bridge from accreditation to a constitutional lawsuit.

    Why it's wrong

    The word any creates an overbroad bridge from accreditation to a constitutional lawsuit.

  • 14275_lantern_launch_observatory · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice AYes, because once the League invited the public to the officer-installation ceremony, the Fourteenth Amendment barred it from excluding women from any leadership role connected to that event.

    Why it's attractive

    The answer turns public attendance into a constitutional trigger without a state decision about the leadership rule.

    Why it's wrong

    The answer turns public attendance into a constitutional trigger without a state decision about the leadership rule.

  • 14294_bible_quiz_uprising · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice Aremand the case to the state supreme court with directions that it resolve the First and Fourteenth Amendment free-speech issue that it discussed in such detail.

    Why it's attractive

    The state court already gave a plain state-law ground; the unresolved federal merits do not need a remand.

    Why it's wrong

    The state court already gave a plain state-law ground; the unresolved federal merits do not need a remand.

  • 14324_lydia_illuminated_psalter · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice DApply federal law governing sales of movable goods, because the psalter moved in interstate commerce.

    Why it's attractive

    The choice creates a federal sales law from the travel fact.

    Why it's wrong

    The choice creates a federal sales law from the travel fact.

  • 14334_bethany_fig_goat_bounty · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice Aconstitutional, because Article I, Section 8 authorizes Congress to enact all laws necessary and proper to promote the general welfare.

    Why it's attractive

    The answer bypasses the repeated federal-land fact and swaps in broad Article I language.

    Why it's wrong

    The answer bypasses the repeated federal-land fact and swaps in broad Article I language.

  • 14342_scripturequest_finals_tax · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice Bconstitutional, because the compelling national interest in reducing the federal budget deficit justifies the tax as a temporary emergency measure.

    Why it's attractive

    It imports compelling-interest review into a federal revenue-tax call.

    Why it's wrong

    It imports compelling-interest review into a federal revenue-tax call.

  • 14343_esther_home_fire_readiness · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice BNo, because Congress has not specifically authorized the creation and support of this new federal advisory commission.

    Why it's attractive

    Turns statutory silence into a categorical prohibition.

    Why it's wrong

    Turns statutory silence into a categorical prohibition.

  • 14344_lydia_marketplace · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice DYes, because Congress could reasonably view the statute as legislation for the general welfare.

    Why it's attractive

    The general-welfare phrase is not an independent regulatory power.

    Why it's wrong

    The general-welfare phrase is not an independent regulatory power.

  • 14352_mercy_timing_act · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice Cunconstitutional, because a presidential veto based on constitutional objections may be overridden only after ratification by three-fourths of the states.

    Why it's attractive

    The three-fourths-states requirement belongs to amendments, not veto overrides.

    Why it's wrong

    The three-fourths-states requirement belongs to amendments, not veto overrides.

  • 14365_imitation_honey · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice AThe General Welfare Clause.

    Why it's attractive

    Only choice framed as a purpose-matched catch-all; anchor says it isn't a regulatory power.

    Why it's wrong

    Only choice framed as a purpose-matched catch-all; anchor says it isn't a regulatory power.

Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.

Practice questions using this trap →