← All traps
ArchitectureBarMatrix curated

Fact Not In Evidence

This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 11 active questions. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”

Subject distribution

  • CRIMINAL8
  • Real Property2
  • Civil Procedure1

Example wrong choices

  • 14148_vineyard-sanctions · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice DYes, because Hannah had no good-faith basis for her claim under any existing law at the time of filing.

    Why it's attractive

    CUT: stem explicitly says the law was 'unresolved'; D flatly contradicts this stated fact

    Why it's wrong

    CUT: stem explicitly says the law was 'unresolved'; D flatly contradicts this stated fact

  • 15012 · REAL_PROPERTY · Choice Bthe owner of Building 1, because the owner of Building 2's rights in the stairway do not extend beyond the normal life of the existing structure.

    Why it's attractive

    B talks about the normal life of the structure. The stem says the stairway is worn and needs repair, not that the structure's life has ended.

    Why it's wrong

    B talks about the normal life of the structure. The stem says the stairway is worn and needs repair, not that the structure's life has ended.

  • 15014 · REAL_PROPERTY · Choice Ainvalid, because of the change of circumstance in the neighborhood.

    Why it's attractive

    This choice points to changed circumstances around East Peterhill, but the stem does not give the needed trigger that the restriction has lost its value across the restricted/benefited land.

    Why it's wrong

    This choice points to changed circumstances around East Peterhill, but the stem does not give the needed trigger that the restriction has lost its value across the restricted/benefited land.

  • 16025_calligraphy_studio · CRIMINAL · Choice CAt the time of the shooting, Martha did not know whether Lydia was about to stab her with a craft knife.

    Why it's attractive

    Not knowing whether danger exists is not the same as believing danger is imminent.

    Why it's wrong

    Not knowing whether danger exists is not the same as believing danger is imminent.

  • 16061_retreat_lake_unlicensed_boat · CRIMINAL · Choice BYes, because operating a boat while intoxicated is a dangerous act.

    Why it's attractive

    It answers a dangerous-intoxication question the stem does not ask.

    Why it's wrong

    It answers a dangerous-intoxication question the stem does not ask.

  • 16061_retreat_lake_unlicensed_boat · CRIMINAL · Choice CYes, because Timothy knew or should have known that operating a boat without a license could result in loss of life.

    Why it's attractive

    It adds a knew-or-should-have-known death-risk element not in the statute.

    Why it's wrong

    It adds a knew-or-should-have-known death-risk element not in the statute.

  • 16061_retreat_lake_unlicensed_boat · CRIMINAL · Choice DNo, because operating a boat without a license is not malum in se.

    Why it's attractive

    It imports a common-law limit after the statute says any misdemeanor.

    Why it's wrong

    It imports a common-law limit after the statute says any misdemeanor.

  • 17294_peter_workshop_open_fields · CRIMINAL · Choice CNo, because the agents had a valid warrant to observe illegal pill-press activity on the property.

    Why it's wrong

    Choice C is not the credited answer for this item.

  • 18217_youth_rally_stop · CRIMINAL · Choice DYes, because Timothy subjectively felt enough pressure to run.

    Why it's attractive

    Even if Timothy felt pressure, the call is not about how pressured he felt. The Gold Key asks whether he submitted or was touched before the discard.

    Why it's wrong

    Even if Timothy felt pressure, the call is not about how pressured he felt. The Gold Key asks whether he submitted or was touched before the discard.

  • 18857_armor_of_god_arrow · CRIMINAL · Choice CYes, but only if Daniel knew Lydia's religious beliefs before shooting the arrow.

    Why it's attractive

    The phrase 'only if' adds a condition the call and Gold Key do not require.

    Why it's wrong

    The phrase 'only if' adds a condition the call and Gold Key do not require.

  • 19692 · CRIMINAL · Choice DNo, because phones cannot be taken by robbery

    Why it's attractive

    The answer invents an object limit. Nothing in the stem suggests a phone is outside the property-crime category.

    Why it's wrong

    The answer invents an object limit. Nothing in the stem suggests a phone is outside the property-crime category.

  • 21530_ministry_van_fraud · CRIMINAL · Choice DNo offense, because Silas voluntarily signed the title and handed over the keys.

    Why it's attractive

    CUT

    Why it's wrong

    CUT

  • 21690_psalms_archive · CRIMINAL · Choice BMartha is not guilty because the manuscript was not actually in the archive room.

    Why it's attractive

    It turns the manuscript's actual location into a defense.

    Why it's wrong

    It turns the manuscript's actual location into a defense.

Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.

Practice questions using this trap →