Factual Misread
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- CRIMINAL1
Example wrong choices
16045_christian-tutor-bribery · CRIMINAL · Choice Ahe did not assist Lydia in committing the crime.
Why it's attractive
The stem says Lydia could not have committed the crime without Peter's payment. His payment was the thing of value. He factually assisted.
Why it's wrong
The stem says Lydia could not have committed the crime without Peter's payment. His payment was the thing of value. He factually assisted.
16045_christian-tutor-bribery · CRIMINAL · Choice Ba person cannot be tried as an accessory until the principal has first been tried and convicted.
Why it's attractive
This sounds like a real procedural safeguard, but the old common-law rule requiring principal conviction before accessory trial has been abandoned in most jurisdictions.
Why it's wrong
This sounds like a real procedural safeguard, but the old common-law rule requiring principal conviction before accessory trial has been abandoned in most jurisdictions.
16045_christian-tutor-bribery · CRIMINAL · Choice Dno person can be charged as an accessory to a crime that could not have been committed without his participation.
Why it's attractive
Wharton's Rule bars conspiracy charges when the crime necessarily requires two participants. But Peter is charged as an accessory to the substantive crime, not with conspiracy. Wrong doctrine for the charge.
Why it's wrong
Wharton's Rule bars conspiracy charges when the crime necessarily requires two participants. But Peter is charged as an accessory to the substantive crime, not with conspiracy. Wrong doctrine for the charge.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →