← All traps
ArchitectureObserved in bank

Fairness Substitution

This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 2 active questions. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”

Subject distribution

  • Civil Procedure1
  • Real Property1

Example wrong choices

  • 17226_cookbook_libel · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice AYes, because Bread of Life Press did not have sufficient minimum contacts with State C.

    Why it's attractive

    Names the correct axis (defendant contacts) but understates the quantum; needs the Keeton anchor to defeat.

    Why it's wrong

    Names the correct axis (defendant contacts) but understates the quantum; needs the Keeton anchor to defeat.

  • 17226_cookbook_libel · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice BYes, because Naomi did not have sufficient minimum contacts with State C.

    Why it's attractive

    Grades the plaintiff's forum contacts; specific PJ measures the defendant's — non-dispositive element.

    Why it's wrong

    Grades the plaintiff's forum contacts; specific PJ measures the defendant's — non-dispositive element.

  • 17226_cookbook_libel · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice DNo, because State C was the only forum still open to Naomi.

    Why it's attractive

    Substitutes 'she had nowhere else to sue' for the contacts analysis; necessity does not confer jurisdiction.

    Why it's wrong

    Substitutes 'she had nowhere else to sue' for the contacts analysis; necessity does not confer jurisdiction.

  • 22002_kiln_room · REAL_PROPERTY · Choice AYes, because Lydia is entitled only to a reduction in rent proportional to the value of the kiln room.

    Why it's attractive

    Concedes the eviction but misstates the controlling remedy as proportional, which the majority rule rejects for a landlord's own actual eviction.

    Why it's wrong

    Concedes the eviction but misstates the controlling remedy as proportional, which the majority rule rejects for a landlord's own actual eviction.

  • 22002_kiln_room · REAL_PROPERTY · Choice CNo, because Barnabas's decision to padlock the kiln room was unreasonable.

    Why it's attractive

    Substitutes 'unreasonable' (a feeling) for the legal test; the court does not inquire into the landlord's motive.

    Why it's wrong

    Substitutes 'unreasonable' (a feeling) for the legal test; the court does not inquire into the landlord's motive.

  • 22002_kiln_room · REAL_PROPERTY · Choice DYes, because Lydia did not vacate the workshop.

    Why it's attractive

    Treats staying in possession as fatal, but vacatur is a non-dispositive element here.

    Why it's wrong

    Treats staying in possession as fatal, but vacatur is a non-dispositive element here.

Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.

Practice questions using this trap →
Fairness Substitution — Trap Taxonomy | BarMatrix