Federal Court Requires Diversity
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Constitutional Law1
Example wrong choices
19338_manna_loaves_license · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice Bdismiss the action, because no federal question is involved.
Why it's attractive
The answer denies the very federal hook that appears in the call facts.
Why it's wrong
The answer denies the very federal hook that appears in the call facts.
19338_manna_loaves_license · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice Chear the action, since Lydia is a resident of the state whose licensing director she is suing.
Why it's attractive
The because-clause points to residency, not the constitutional claim.
Why it's wrong
The because-clause points to residency, not the constitutional claim.
19338_manna_loaves_license · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice Ddismiss the action, since Lydia is a resident of the state whose licensing director she is suing.
Why it's attractive
The answer treats shared state residence as the controlling issue and skips the constitutional claim.
Why it's wrong
The answer treats shared state residence as the controlling issue and skips the constitutional claim.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →