← All traps
ArchitectureObserved in bank

Flat Misstatement

This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 418 active questions. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”

Subject distribution

  • CRIMINAL123
  • Evidence75
  • Real Property71
  • Contracts43
  • Civil Procedure36
  • Constitutional Law36
  • Torts21
  • Criminal Law13

Example wrong choices

first 20
  • 14014_scripture_cart_jury_poll · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice CNo, because a federal judge may not poll the jurors on the judge's own initiative.

    Why it's attractive

    The answer attacks the judge's power to poll without a request.

    Why it's wrong

    The answer attacks the judge's power to poll without a request.

  • 14062_stephens-orchard-late-changed-charge · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice BNo, because Stephen's objection was untimely, and any alleged error would have been upheld under the "clearly erroneous" standard of review.

    Why it's attractive

    Pairs the same false 'untimely' premise with an appellate buzzword; the 'clearly erroneous' label is the tell.

    Why it's wrong

    Pairs the same false 'untimely' premise with an appellate buzzword; the 'clearly erroneous' label is the tell.

  • 14071_threshing-sledge-patent · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice BThe judgment cannot stand because the Seventh Amendment does not apply to patent infringement suits seeking money damages.

    Why it's attractive

    Says the jury right does NOT reach a money-damages action; that is the opposite of the rule.

    Why it's wrong

    Says the jury right does NOT reach a money-damages action; that is the opposite of the rule.

  • 14090_federal_military_property_duty_defense · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice ANo, because the Erie decision ended the use of federal common law in diversity cases.

    Why it's wrong

    Choice A is not the credited answer for this item.

  • 14132_lydia_vineyard_smj · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice CNo, because Lydia's lawyer has no option but to continue with the trial.

    Why it's attractive

    Choice says the lawyer must continue, but the stem has just revealed a jurisdiction defect.

    Why it's wrong

    Choice says the lawyer must continue, but the stem has just revealed a jurisdiction defect.

  • 14148_vineyard-sanctions · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice DYes, because Hannah had no good-faith basis for her claim under any existing law at the time of filing.

    Why it's attractive

    CUT: stem explicitly says the law was 'unresolved'; D flatly contradicts this stated fact

    Why it's wrong

    CUT: stem explicitly says the law was 'unresolved'; D flatly contradicts this stated fact

  • 14150_livestock_trailer_rancher · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice AYes, because the manufacturer and service center were misjoined and dismissal is the proper remedy.

    Why it's wrong

    Choice A is not the credited answer for this item.

  • 14205_fellowship_hall · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice BNo, because it does not state that an actual judgment was entered.

    Why it's wrong

    Choice B is not the credited answer for this item.

  • 14208_women_of_the_word · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice AYes, because Esther's attorney mailed notice to Lydia.

    Why it's wrong

    Choice A is not the credited answer for this item.

  • 14216_retreat_shuttle · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice CYes. Lydia will be precluded from relitigating whether Barnabas negligently backed into the tent.

    Why it's attractive

    It treats an ambiguous general verdict as a clear decision against a later nonparty.

    Why it's wrong

    It treats an ambiguous general verdict as a clear decision against a later nonparty.

  • 14222_piano_tutor_counterclaim_default · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice CNo, because Peter still had time to answer the counterclaim.

    Why it's attractive

    Four weeks is more than 21 days after service.

    Why it's wrong

    Four weeks is more than 21 days after service.

  • 14227_priscilla_treasurer · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice APriscilla must demonstrate that the statute is not rationally related to a legitimate state interest.

    Why it's wrong

    Choice A is not the credited answer for this item.

  • 14231_hymn-trailer-premium · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice DYes, because charging a higher premium based on a customer's residential area is inherently discriminatory.

    Why it's attractive

    D treats unfair private pricing as automatically constitutional discrimination.

    Why it's wrong

    D treats unfair private pricing as automatically constitutional discrimination.

  • 14234_barnabas-house · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice CBecause housing is a fundamental right, the commission must prove that the denial is necessary to serve a compelling governmental interest.

    Why it's attractive

    Choice depends on a Gold Key the doctrine rejects.

    Why it's wrong

    Choice depends on a Gold Key the doctrine rejects.

  • 14234_barnabas-house · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice DBecause the commission's action invidiously discriminates against a suspect class, the commission must prove that the denial is necessary to serve a compelling governmental interest.

    Why it's attractive

    Choice uses suspect-class label without a recognized suspect classification in the stem.

    Why it's wrong

    Choice uses suspect-class label without a recognized suspect classification in the stem.

  • 14248_lydia_clay_reclamation · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice DLydia's Workshop should prevail on its claim for expected profits, but not on its claim for the equipment costs.

    Why it's attractive

    It treats expected profits as the taken property even though the stem's retained-use facts point away from compensation.

    Why it's wrong

    It treats expected profits as the taken property even though the stem's retained-use facts point away from compensation.

  • 14286_human-cannonball-barnabas · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice Dhold against the performer, because under the First and Fourteenth Amendments news broadcasts are absolutely privileged.

    Why it's attractive

    Constitutional privileges for the press are never absolute. 'Always/never/only' formulations are structural red flags.

    Why it's wrong

    Constitutional privileges for the press are never absolute. 'Always/never/only' formulations are structural red flags.

  • 14287_psalm_choir_teacher_license · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice ANo, because the Constitution does not apply to state professional licensing.

    Why it's attractive

    The state education board is the actor. That visible state actor makes the First Amendment relevant.

    Why it's wrong

    The state education board is the actor. That visible state actor makes the First Amendment relevant.

  • 14287_psalm_choir_teacher_license · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice CNo, because membership in a subversive organization counts as endorsement of the group's illegal activities.

    Why it's attractive

    The stem gives no fact that Lydia intended to further illegal aims.

    Why it's wrong

    The stem gives no fact that Lydia intended to further illegal aims.

  • 14311_psalm_slides_field_kit · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice DNo, because taxing the personal-use value of equipment furnished by the federal government is a tax on the United States.

    Why it's attractive

    Federal ownership of the kit does not itself make an employee-income tax a tax on the United States.

    Why it's wrong

    Federal ownership of the kit does not itself make an employee-income tax a tax on the United States.

Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.

Practice questions using this trap →
Flat Misstatement — Trap Taxonomy | BarMatrix