← All traps
MisconceptionObserved in bank

Forced Entry Taints All Later Evidence

This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”

Subject distribution

  • CRIMINAL1

Example wrong choices

  • 14580_ichthys_keyboard_case · CRIMINAL · Choice ADenied, because the police had reasonable grounds to believe that weapons were kept in the rowhouse.

    Why it's attractive

    The challenged items were on Peter's person, but the answer talks about weapons somewhere in the rowhouse.

    Why it's wrong

    The challenged items were on Peter's person, but the answer talks about weapons somewhere in the rowhouse.

  • 14580_ichthys_keyboard_case · CRIMINAL · Choice CGranted, because the police did not tell Peter that he was under arrest and did not read him Miranda warnings.

    Why it's attractive

    The challenged evidence is physical weapons, not a compelled testimonial answer.

    Why it's wrong

    The challenged evidence is physical weapons, not a compelled testimonial answer.

  • 14580_ichthys_keyboard_case · CRIMINAL · Choice DGranted, because the search and seizure resulted from illegal police conduct in executing the search warrant.

    Why it's attractive

    The stem gives a valid warrant and announcement, so this answer needs a suppression-triggering illegality the facts do not supply.

    Why it's wrong

    The stem gives a valid warrant and announcement, so this answer needs a suppression-triggering illegality the facts do not supply.

Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.

Practice questions using this trap →
Forced Entry Taints All Later Evidence — Trap Taxonomy | BarMatrix