Formation Vs Breach
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Contracts1
Example wrong choices
14457_advent_kits_requirements · CONTRACTS · Choice ANo, because Martha’s Paper House could, and did, revoke its offer as to later deliveries.
Why it's attractive
The answer says revoke offer, but the stem says signed writing and four months of performance.
Why it's wrong
The answer says revoke offer, but the stem says signed writing and four months of performance.
14457_advent_kits_requirements · CONTRACTS · Choice BNo, because no stated minimum quantity made Bethany’s promise illusory.
Why it's attractive
The Gold Key says all-requirements language is enough.
Why it's wrong
The Gold Key says all-requirements language is enough.
14457_advent_kits_requirements · CONTRACTS · Choice DYes, because four months of performance by both sides made the agreement enforceable for the entire year.
Why it's attractive
Part performance is a rescue path; the stem already gives an enforceable requirements agreement.
Why it's wrong
Part performance is a rescue path; the stem already gives an enforceable requirements agreement.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →