Fraud Motive Equals Predicate
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- CRIMINAL1
Example wrong choices
22405_boathouse_loft_fire · CRIMINAL · Choice ANot guilty, because Daniel reasonably believed Naomi was away from the boathouse.
Why it's attractive
The choice makes lack of intent to kill dispositive even though the call includes a death during arson.
Why it's wrong
The choice makes lack of intent to kill dispositive even though the call includes a death during arson.
22405_boathouse_loft_fire · CRIMINAL · Choice BNot guilty, because the fire was part of Naomi's own fraudulent insurance plan.
Why it's attractive
The choice treats Naomi's participation as if it cancels the homicide.
Why it's wrong
The choice treats Naomi's participation as if it cancels the homicide.
22405_boathouse_loft_fire · CRIMINAL · Choice DGuilty, because Daniel was helping Naomi submit a false insurance claim.
Why it's attractive
The guilty result is tempting, but the because-clause names insurance fraud instead of arson.
Why it's wrong
The guilty result is tempting, but the because-clause names insurance fraud instead of arson.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →