Future Provider Beneficiary
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Contracts1
Example wrong choices
14546_koine_tutor · CONTRACTS · Choice ANo, because Lydia was neither identified when Ruth's promise was made nor aware of it when the tutoring agreement was made.
Why it's attractive
The choice repeats unnamed and unaware facts, but the call asks whether Lydia can enforce after Timothy hired her.
Why it's wrong
The choice repeats unnamed and unaware facts, but the call asks whether Lydia can enforce after Timothy hired her.
14546_koine_tutor · CONTRACTS · Choice BNo, because Ruth's promise to Timothy is unenforceable under the suretyship clause of the Statute of Frauds.
Why it's attractive
The choice imports a writing doctrine instead of answering the provider-beneficiary route.
Why it's wrong
The choice imports a writing doctrine instead of answering the provider-beneficiary route.
14546_koine_tutor · CONTRACTS · Choice DYes, under the doctrine of promissory estoppel.
Why it's attractive
The choice needs reliance, but the stem says Lydia did not know of the promise when she agreed.
Why it's wrong
The choice needs reliance, but the stem says Lydia did not know of the promise when she agreed.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →