General Intent Allegation Cures Missing Fraud Circumstances
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Civil Procedure1
Example wrong choices
18750_choir_van_repair · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice BDeny the motion because every civil claim may be pleaded under Rule 8's notice-pleading standard alone.
Why it's attractive
The answer says every civil claim uses Rule 8 alone; fraud is a special pleading matter.
Why it's wrong
The answer says every civil claim uses Rule 8 alone; fraud is a special pleading matter.
18750_choir_van_repair · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice CGrant the motion because Stephen's alleged intentional conduct shows that the court lacks personal jurisdiction.
Why it's attractive
The call is about pleading fraud, not whether the court can exercise personal jurisdiction.
Why it's wrong
The call is about pleading fraud, not whether the court can exercise personal jurisdiction.
18750_choir_van_repair · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice DDeny the motion because intent to deceive may be alleged generally.
Why it's attractive
The intent sentence is true, but it addresses only mind state, not the required circumstances.
Why it's wrong
The intent sentence is true, but it addresses only mind state, not the required circumstances.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →