MisconceptionObserved in bank
Grand Jury Evidence Is Screened Like Trial Evidence
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- CRIMINAL1
Example wrong choices
14561_grand_jury_lantern_prints · CRIMINAL · Choice AGranted, because the assistant was acting as a police agent and the warrantless removal of the lantern was unconstitutional.
Why it's attractive
litigates agency instead of grand-jury timing
Why it's wrong
litigates agency instead of grand-jury timing
14561_grand_jury_lantern_prints · CRIMINAL · Choice CDenied, because the lantern was removed from Stephen's possession by a private citizen and not a police officer.
Why it's attractive
denies the motion for a private-citizen reason despite police persuasion
Why it's wrong
denies the motion for a private-citizen reason despite police persuasion
14561_grand_jury_lantern_prints · CRIMINAL · Choice DGranted, because, if there was no probable cause, the grand jury should not consider the evidence.
Why it's attractive
adds a probable-cause condition to grand-jury evidence
Why it's wrong
adds a probable-cause condition to grand-jury evidence
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →